.jpg)
From a report by Chuck Quirmbach on Wisconsin Public Radio:
(STATE CAPITOL) A key lawmaker says some compromises have been reached in the global warming bill now in the State Legislature. But he says more deal-making is ahead.
During the last couple of weeks, legislators have been working behind closed doors trying to agree on changes to the Clean Energy Jobs Act. At an energy forum in Milwaukee, Senate author Mark Miller said some agreements have been reached. The Madison-area Democrat says there are deals on idling of trucks, reducing carbon in transportation fuels, tariffs for utilities purchasing power from renewable sources, and whether to link Wisconsin car fuel efficiency standards to California's. He says the golden state plan is gone.
Miller says the plan to reduce carbon in fuels ran into a lot of opposition, and wasn’t a major part of the bill. The changes are good news to the Democrats leading candidate for governor, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. Barrett says any new carbon in fuels standard would also have hurt the state.
Sen. Miller says lawmakers are also trying to accelerate job creation goals in the Clean Energy Jobs Act. He says he's hoping to announce final compromises next week.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Over 200 businesses pledge support for Clean Energy Jobs Act
From a news release issued by Clean Wisconsin:
Regionally Diverse Large and Small Businesses Among Supporters
MADISON -- In a show of support for the Clean Energy Jobs Act, the Wisconsin business community delivered a letter signed by over 200 Wisconsin businesses to state legislators today highlighting the economic and job-creation benefits of strong energy efficiency and renewable energy policies.
"As businesses currently working in the production, installation and maintenance of energy efficiency and renewable energy systems we understand better than anyone that clean energy policies create jobs and stimulate local economies," read the letter. "By enacting statewide policies that will help Wisconsinites make their homes and businesses more energy efficient or invest in renewable energy, the state Legislature will create thousands of jobs and help support local businesses like ours..."
Studies have repeatedly demonstrated the job-creation potential of the Clean Energy Jobs Act. A recent study from the Office of Energy Independence estimates that the bill would create over 15,000 jobs in the state.
"Wisconsin’s businesses support the Clean Energy Jobs Act because they recognize its enormous potential to create jobs and aid economic recovery," said Keith Reopelle, senior policy director at Clean Wisconsin. "With strong renewable energy and energy efficiency policies, Wisconsin can become a leader in the production of clean energy technologies."
"Clean energy policies like those in the Clean Energy Jobs Act help businesses like Wave Wind grow," said Dionne Lummus at Wave Wind Energy located in Sun Prairie. "Increased demand for renewable energy means an increased demand for our services, which translates to more jobs and economic growth in Wisconsin."
A report released this morning by the Union of Concerned Scientists shows that securing 25 percent of the state’s renewable electricity by 2025, a main provision of the bill, is affordable and easily achievable. In fact, the report illustrates that generating 25 percent of Wisconsin’s current electricity load would require only 5 percent of the state’s renewable energy potential.
Regionally Diverse Large and Small Businesses Among Supporters
MADISON -- In a show of support for the Clean Energy Jobs Act, the Wisconsin business community delivered a letter signed by over 200 Wisconsin businesses to state legislators today highlighting the economic and job-creation benefits of strong energy efficiency and renewable energy policies.
"As businesses currently working in the production, installation and maintenance of energy efficiency and renewable energy systems we understand better than anyone that clean energy policies create jobs and stimulate local economies," read the letter. "By enacting statewide policies that will help Wisconsinites make their homes and businesses more energy efficient or invest in renewable energy, the state Legislature will create thousands of jobs and help support local businesses like ours..."
Studies have repeatedly demonstrated the job-creation potential of the Clean Energy Jobs Act. A recent study from the Office of Energy Independence estimates that the bill would create over 15,000 jobs in the state.
"Wisconsin’s businesses support the Clean Energy Jobs Act because they recognize its enormous potential to create jobs and aid economic recovery," said Keith Reopelle, senior policy director at Clean Wisconsin. "With strong renewable energy and energy efficiency policies, Wisconsin can become a leader in the production of clean energy technologies."
"Clean energy policies like those in the Clean Energy Jobs Act help businesses like Wave Wind grow," said Dionne Lummus at Wave Wind Energy located in Sun Prairie. "Increased demand for renewable energy means an increased demand for our services, which translates to more jobs and economic growth in Wisconsin."
A report released this morning by the Union of Concerned Scientists shows that securing 25 percent of the state’s renewable electricity by 2025, a main provision of the bill, is affordable and easily achievable. In fact, the report illustrates that generating 25 percent of Wisconsin’s current electricity load would require only 5 percent of the state’s renewable energy potential.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Colorado increases renewables and distributed generation requirements
While the Wisconsin legislature considers a renewable portfolio requirement of 25% by 2025, Colorado will soon have a requirement of 30% by 2020, according to an article by Kate Balbraith on a New York Times blog:
In a bid to propel his state to the forefront of the new energy economy, Colorado’s governor is expected to sign one of the most aggressive renewable energy requirements in the country on Monday afternoon.
The new law requires 30 percent of large utilities’ electricity to come from renewables by 2020. The previous requirement was 20 percent by 2020.
The higher target “will continue to position Colorado as a national pacesetter for creating jobs, strengthening our economy and protecting our environment,” wrote the governor, Bill Ritter, in an op-ed article in a Colorado newspaper on Sunday.
About half of all states in the country have renewable energy requirements, known as a “renewable portfolio standard.”
California’s rule — the most aggressive — requires big utilities to get 33 percent of their electricity from renewables by 2020, and 20 percent by 2010. However, the state is likely to fall short of the 2010 goal — showing that targets are easy to establish but more difficult to meet.
Mark Stutz, a spokesman for Xcel Energy, which serves about 70 percent of Colorado’s population, said that the utility supported Colorado’s increased target. The new law also requires that “distributed generation” — small, dispersed electricity sources — equate to 3 percent of each utility’s electricity sales.
In a bid to propel his state to the forefront of the new energy economy, Colorado’s governor is expected to sign one of the most aggressive renewable energy requirements in the country on Monday afternoon.
The new law requires 30 percent of large utilities’ electricity to come from renewables by 2020. The previous requirement was 20 percent by 2020.
The higher target “will continue to position Colorado as a national pacesetter for creating jobs, strengthening our economy and protecting our environment,” wrote the governor, Bill Ritter, in an op-ed article in a Colorado newspaper on Sunday.
About half of all states in the country have renewable energy requirements, known as a “renewable portfolio standard.”
California’s rule — the most aggressive — requires big utilities to get 33 percent of their electricity from renewables by 2020, and 20 percent by 2010. However, the state is likely to fall short of the 2010 goal — showing that targets are easy to establish but more difficult to meet.
Mark Stutz, a spokesman for Xcel Energy, which serves about 70 percent of Colorado’s population, said that the utility supported Colorado’s increased target. The new law also requires that “distributed generation” — small, dispersed electricity sources — equate to 3 percent of each utility’s electricity sales.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
MGE points to benefits of energy conservation
From an aritcle by Judy Newman in the Wisconsin State Journal:
Madison Gas & Electric customers may have more electrical devices plugged in at their homes, but they are using 6 percent less energy, on average, than five years ago.
“That’s huge,” said Greg Bollom, assistant vice president for energy planning.
As a result, MGE has pared its projected electricity needs for 2015 by 10 percent. Since the early 1980s, conservation by the utility’s customers has saved MGE the equivalent of the need for a new power plant comparable to its 225-megawatt share of the Columbia power plant near Portage, Bollom said.
“The pace of conservation and energy efficiency has really, really picked up,” he said.
Just by switching to compact fluorescent light bulbs and an energy-efficient furnace, “your benefits start to accumulate,” MGE spokesman Steve Kraus said.
With the support of customers who have signed up to pay more for renewable energy, MGE has contracted to buy power from three more wind farms over the past five years, raising its access to wind-generated electricity from 11 megawatts to 138 megawatts. The Madison utility company also expanded the use of solar power and now has 140 customers with solar panels on their homes or businesses, sending power onto the grid of transmission lines that carry electricity around the state.
Madison Gas & Electric customers may have more electrical devices plugged in at their homes, but they are using 6 percent less energy, on average, than five years ago.
“That’s huge,” said Greg Bollom, assistant vice president for energy planning.
As a result, MGE has pared its projected electricity needs for 2015 by 10 percent. Since the early 1980s, conservation by the utility’s customers has saved MGE the equivalent of the need for a new power plant comparable to its 225-megawatt share of the Columbia power plant near Portage, Bollom said.
“The pace of conservation and energy efficiency has really, really picked up,” he said.
Just by switching to compact fluorescent light bulbs and an energy-efficient furnace, “your benefits start to accumulate,” MGE spokesman Steve Kraus said.
With the support of customers who have signed up to pay more for renewable energy, MGE has contracted to buy power from three more wind farms over the past five years, raising its access to wind-generated electricity from 11 megawatts to 138 megawatts. The Madison utility company also expanded the use of solar power and now has 140 customers with solar panels on their homes or businesses, sending power onto the grid of transmission lines that carry electricity around the state.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Case Builds for the Clean Energy Jobs Act Bills
From Wisconsin Renewable Quarterly, Spring 2010, the newsletter of RENEW Wisconsin:
After holding five public hearings on the Clean Energy Jobs Act (CEJA) legislation, the committees’ co-chairs signaled their plan to hammer out a set of substitute proposals in meetings among themselves.
While waiting for the expected substitute amendment sometime in late March, proponents continue to build the public case for passage in this legislative session.
The refashioned bill will likely retain the core provisions in the original, specifically:
+ 25% renewable energy standard(RES) by 2025;
+ 10% in-state renewable energy set-aside, also by 2025; and
+ Energy efficiency goals to begin reduction of consumption in 2011.
The original legislation (AB 649/SB 450) also contained a requirement that the Public Service Commission (PSC) increase buyback rates for small renewable systems. This controversial section is likely to be reworked substantially in the substitute amendment.
Since the introduction of the bills in early January, many affected interests have bombarded the print and electronic media with news releases, advertisements, economic analyses, news conferences, commentaries, and photo opportunities in hopes of influencing the Legislature before the session ends.
Just to list a few examples from the proponents:
+ RENEW Wisconsin released a study in February showing that increased renewable energy buyback rates, by themselves, would have a minimal impact on base residential electricity rates;
Other newsletter articles:
Tour Spotlights Homegrown Renewables
Energizing Fort Atkinson Schools
Clearing Up Lakes with Clean Energy
Of Molehills and Renewable Energy
Calendar
After holding five public hearings on the Clean Energy Jobs Act (CEJA) legislation, the committees’ co-chairs signaled their plan to hammer out a set of substitute proposals in meetings among themselves.
While waiting for the expected substitute amendment sometime in late March, proponents continue to build the public case for passage in this legislative session.
The refashioned bill will likely retain the core provisions in the original, specifically:
+ 25% renewable energy standard(RES) by 2025;
+ 10% in-state renewable energy set-aside, also by 2025; and
+ Energy efficiency goals to begin reduction of consumption in 2011.
The original legislation (AB 649/SB 450) also contained a requirement that the Public Service Commission (PSC) increase buyback rates for small renewable systems. This controversial section is likely to be reworked substantially in the substitute amendment.
Since the introduction of the bills in early January, many affected interests have bombarded the print and electronic media with news releases, advertisements, economic analyses, news conferences, commentaries, and photo opportunities in hopes of influencing the Legislature before the session ends.
Just to list a few examples from the proponents:
+ RENEW Wisconsin released a study in February showing that increased renewable energy buyback rates, by themselves, would have a minimal impact on base residential electricity rates;
Other newsletter articles:
Tour Spotlights Homegrown Renewables
Energizing Fort Atkinson Schools
Clearing Up Lakes with Clean Energy
Of Molehills and Renewable Energy
Calendar
Friday, March 19, 2010
The Wisconsin Chapter of the
Association of Energy Services Professionals
Invites you to Attend
This event will kick-off with a presentation from the Office of Energy Independence (OEI) followed by a panel discussion on the environmental/energy impacts of biofuels:
+ Judy Ziewacz, Office of Energy Independence
+ Biofuels Panel, participants to be announced
Presentations will be followed by open floor discussion.
Don’t miss your chance to get in on this lively and important discussion!
Time: Thursday, April 22, 5:00 to 7:00
Place: WECC Office, 431 Charmany Drive, Madison, WI
Social hour from 5:00 to 5:30. Good food and drinks!
Cost: 15$ AESP members and Non-Profit Organizations
25$ Non-members
5$ Students/Unemployed
(Check or cash payment can be paid at the event)
RSVP to Kristopher at reimannk@gmail.com before April 20.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Governors seek national power standard to boost wind industry
From an article by Kim Chipman on Bloomberg.com:
March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Congress must set a national renewable-power standard and revamp the electric grid to help the burgeoning U.S. wind-energy industry reach its potential and compete globally, governors from 29 states said.
A jumble of state laws should be replaced by a federal edict, according to a report from the Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition, which includes California, Florida and Massachusetts. The plan would help spur development and efficiency, which would create jobs, curb greenhouse-gas emissions and reduce dependency on oil imports, the coalition said.
The absence of such a standard is hurting the U.S., the governors said. China installed more wind-energy generators last year than any other country, doubling the nation’s windpower capacity, according to data released by the World Wind Energy Association last week. U.S. capacity, still the largest in the world, rose about 39 percent.
“The lack of a long-term renewable energy requirement in the United States is resulting in the loss of wind-manufacturing investments in our states to Europe and other areas,” the governors said in the report.
March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Congress must set a national renewable-power standard and revamp the electric grid to help the burgeoning U.S. wind-energy industry reach its potential and compete globally, governors from 29 states said.
A jumble of state laws should be replaced by a federal edict, according to a report from the Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition, which includes California, Florida and Massachusetts. The plan would help spur development and efficiency, which would create jobs, curb greenhouse-gas emissions and reduce dependency on oil imports, the coalition said.
The absence of such a standard is hurting the U.S., the governors said. China installed more wind-energy generators last year than any other country, doubling the nation’s windpower capacity, according to data released by the World Wind Energy Association last week. U.S. capacity, still the largest in the world, rose about 39 percent.
“The lack of a long-term renewable energy requirement in the United States is resulting in the loss of wind-manufacturing investments in our states to Europe and other areas,” the governors said in the report.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
PSC appoints wind siting council
A news release from the Public Service Commission:
The Public Service Commission (PSC) today announced appointments to Wisconsin’s Wind Siting Council, an advisory body created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 40 (Act 40). Act 40 directs the PSC to develop administrative rules that specify the restrictions that may be imposed on the installation or use of wind energy systems. The new law also requires the PSC to appoint a Wind Siting Council that will advise the PSC as it develops uniform wind siting standards for Wisconsin.
“I am very pleased to have the Wind Siting Council up and running,” said PSC Chairman Eric Callisto. “Wind siting regulation is complex and sometimes controversial. I look forward to the Council’s input as we develop these rules for Wisconsin, and I thank the Council members for their service.”
Council members were selected to adhere to Act 40’s specific categorical requirements. The following people have been appointed to serve on Wisconsin’s Wind Siting Council:
Dan Ebert, WPPI Energy
David Gilles, Godfrey & Kahn
Tom Green, Wind Capital Group
Jennifer Heinzen, Lakeshore Technical College
Andy Hesselbach, We Energies
George Krause Jr., Choice Residential LLC
Lloyd Lueschow, Green County
Jevon McFadden, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health
Tom Meyer, Restaino & Associates
Bill Rakocy, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, LLC
Dwight Sattler, Landowner
Ryan Schryver, Clean Wisconsin
Michael Vickerman, RENEW Wisconsin
Larry Wunsch, Landowner
Doug Zweizig, Union Township
The Public Service Commission (PSC) today announced appointments to Wisconsin’s Wind Siting Council, an advisory body created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 40 (Act 40). Act 40 directs the PSC to develop administrative rules that specify the restrictions that may be imposed on the installation or use of wind energy systems. The new law also requires the PSC to appoint a Wind Siting Council that will advise the PSC as it develops uniform wind siting standards for Wisconsin.
“I am very pleased to have the Wind Siting Council up and running,” said PSC Chairman Eric Callisto. “Wind siting regulation is complex and sometimes controversial. I look forward to the Council’s input as we develop these rules for Wisconsin, and I thank the Council members for their service.”
Council members were selected to adhere to Act 40’s specific categorical requirements. The following people have been appointed to serve on Wisconsin’s Wind Siting Council:
Dan Ebert, WPPI Energy
David Gilles, Godfrey & Kahn
Tom Green, Wind Capital Group
Jennifer Heinzen, Lakeshore Technical College
Andy Hesselbach, We Energies
George Krause Jr., Choice Residential LLC
Lloyd Lueschow, Green County
Jevon McFadden, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health
Tom Meyer, Restaino & Associates
Bill Rakocy, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, LLC
Dwight Sattler, Landowner
Ryan Schryver, Clean Wisconsin
Michael Vickerman, RENEW Wisconsin
Larry Wunsch, Landowner
Doug Zweizig, Union Township
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
We Energies files application for biomass plant
From an article by Tom Content in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Seeking to expand its renewable power portfolio beyond wind farms, We Energies on Monday filed an application with state regulators to build a $255 million biomass power plant near Wausau.
The project would supply steam to Domtar Corp.'s paper mill in Rothschild and create up to 150 jobs, the utility said in its application to the state Public Service Commission.
The 50-megawatt power plant would generate enough power to supply 40,000 typical homes, We Energies said.
We Energies, which announced the project last fall, said it would like the Public Service Commission to rule on the project by year-end to help it stay on a timeline aimed at the project qualifying for a 30% federal tax credit.
Qualifying for the tax credit would enable the project's cost for the utility and We Energies ratepayers be cheaper, said Brian Manthey, utility spokesman. If the tax credit is available, We Energies projects the project would raise customers' rates by 1% to 1.25%, he said.
It's unclear what the actual dollar impact of the project would be for ratepayers, but at today's rates it would be roughly $1 a month for the typical residential customer.
Construction would start next year and last for about 30 months. The project is expected to create about 400 temporary construction jobs in addition to jobs at the power plant and in the logging and forestry sector.
Seeking to expand its renewable power portfolio beyond wind farms, We Energies on Monday filed an application with state regulators to build a $255 million biomass power plant near Wausau.
The project would supply steam to Domtar Corp.'s paper mill in Rothschild and create up to 150 jobs, the utility said in its application to the state Public Service Commission.
The 50-megawatt power plant would generate enough power to supply 40,000 typical homes, We Energies said.
We Energies, which announced the project last fall, said it would like the Public Service Commission to rule on the project by year-end to help it stay on a timeline aimed at the project qualifying for a 30% federal tax credit.
Qualifying for the tax credit would enable the project's cost for the utility and We Energies ratepayers be cheaper, said Brian Manthey, utility spokesman. If the tax credit is available, We Energies projects the project would raise customers' rates by 1% to 1.25%, he said.
It's unclear what the actual dollar impact of the project would be for ratepayers, but at today's rates it would be roughly $1 a month for the typical residential customer.
Construction would start next year and last for about 30 months. The project is expected to create about 400 temporary construction jobs in addition to jobs at the power plant and in the logging and forestry sector.
Monday, March 15, 2010
PSC: Clean energy naysayers have it wrong
From a letter to the Wisconsin legislature from Public Service Commission (PSC) Chair Eric Callisto:
Yesterday [March 12, 2010], several interest groups wrote legislators urging opposition to the Clean Energy Jobs Act. The groups warned that the cost of renewable energy standards and enhanced energy efficiency programs would be "enonnous" and the benefits only "nominal." Once again, the clean energy naysayers have it wrong. Enhanced renewable portfolio standards and increasing our efforts in energy efficiency reduce our dependence on imported energy, keep more of our energy dollars here at home, and help to ensure that Wisconsin and our country is competitive in the global energy economy.
You should know that the memo from clean energy opponents includes some key factual errors.
In particular, it claims that enhanced energy efficiency programs will add $700 million in new costs for consumers, citing a report by the Energy Center of Wisconsin (ECW). In reality, we will save money on our energy bills the IOOre we do on energy efficiency. It is common sense -- the less energy we consume, the less we pay on our utility bills.
As for the ECW report, what it actually concludes is that Wisconsin consumers will save $900 million per year in energy costs if we invest between $350 and $400 million in energy efficiency programs; and if we invest roughly $700 million in energy efficiency. Wisconsin consumers will save $2 billion per year in energy costs. . . . Incidentally, ECW also found that enhancing our energy efficiency programs would support between 7000 and 9000 new jobs. The
bottom line is that if we don't invest in energy efficiency, we will be spending significantly more on new generation.
The memo also claims that meeting a 25 percent renewable portfolio standard will add more than $15 billion in extra costs for consumers. Increasing our renewable energy portfolio can reduce Wisconsin energy costs in the long run, particularly when implemented alongside enhanced energy efficiency programs - as the Clean Energy Jobs Act envisions. The enclosed, recent Public Service Commission analysis, confirms that.
Yesterday [March 12, 2010], several interest groups wrote legislators urging opposition to the Clean Energy Jobs Act. The groups warned that the cost of renewable energy standards and enhanced energy efficiency programs would be "enonnous" and the benefits only "nominal." Once again, the clean energy naysayers have it wrong. Enhanced renewable portfolio standards and increasing our efforts in energy efficiency reduce our dependence on imported energy, keep more of our energy dollars here at home, and help to ensure that Wisconsin and our country is competitive in the global energy economy.
You should know that the memo from clean energy opponents includes some key factual errors.
In particular, it claims that enhanced energy efficiency programs will add $700 million in new costs for consumers, citing a report by the Energy Center of Wisconsin (ECW). In reality, we will save money on our energy bills the IOOre we do on energy efficiency. It is common sense -- the less energy we consume, the less we pay on our utility bills.
As for the ECW report, what it actually concludes is that Wisconsin consumers will save $900 million per year in energy costs if we invest between $350 and $400 million in energy efficiency programs; and if we invest roughly $700 million in energy efficiency. Wisconsin consumers will save $2 billion per year in energy costs. . . . Incidentally, ECW also found that enhancing our energy efficiency programs would support between 7000 and 9000 new jobs. The
bottom line is that if we don't invest in energy efficiency, we will be spending significantly more on new generation.
The memo also claims that meeting a 25 percent renewable portfolio standard will add more than $15 billion in extra costs for consumers. Increasing our renewable energy portfolio can reduce Wisconsin energy costs in the long run, particularly when implemented alongside enhanced energy efficiency programs - as the Clean Energy Jobs Act envisions. The enclosed, recent Public Service Commission analysis, confirms that.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Business coalition lauds Doyle’s efforts to improve energy efficiency
From a news release issued by Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy (CREWE):
(MADISON, Wis.)—Gov. Jim Doyle’s awarding Wednesday of $1.7 million in competitive grants to improve energy efficiency shows his administration’s clear commitment to leading the state to a new, green economy, the coalition for Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy (CREWE) announced.
BPM Incorporated, Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, Mercury Marine, Procter & Gamble and Thilmany Papers all received funding from the Focus on Energy industrial grant program, which also will reduce energy costs and create jobs.
“Providing the tools and funding that our manufacturers need to stay competitive and improve energy efficiency will positively affect Wisconsin’s economy,” Thad Nation, executive director of CREWE, said. “Legislators in Madison should work to find a consensus on the Clean Energy Jobs Act to ensure state businesses have the opportunity to take advantage of energy efficiency efforts.”
According to a release from the Governor’s office, the grant recipients will save an estimated 12.5 million kilowatt-hours of electricity and 1.1 million therms of natural gas annually, which is enough to eliminate more than 35 million pounds of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere.
CREWE is a coalition that formed to advocate meaningful change in energy policy consistent with the Governor’s Global Warming Task Force final report, which will have a positive impact on Wisconsin’s economic development and security while fostering job creation.
CREWE’s membership consists of CleanPower, Alliant Energy, EcoEnergy, Johnson Controls, Xcel Energy, C5•6 Technologies, Axley Brynelson, Madison Gas and Electric, Orion Energy Systems, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin Energy Corp., Poblocki Sign Company, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, MillerCoors, American Transmission Co., WPPI Energy, DTE Energy Services, Kranz, Inc. and Greenwood Fuels.
(MADISON, Wis.)—Gov. Jim Doyle’s awarding Wednesday of $1.7 million in competitive grants to improve energy efficiency shows his administration’s clear commitment to leading the state to a new, green economy, the coalition for Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy (CREWE) announced.
BPM Incorporated, Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, Mercury Marine, Procter & Gamble and Thilmany Papers all received funding from the Focus on Energy industrial grant program, which also will reduce energy costs and create jobs.
“Providing the tools and funding that our manufacturers need to stay competitive and improve energy efficiency will positively affect Wisconsin’s economy,” Thad Nation, executive director of CREWE, said. “Legislators in Madison should work to find a consensus on the Clean Energy Jobs Act to ensure state businesses have the opportunity to take advantage of energy efficiency efforts.”
According to a release from the Governor’s office, the grant recipients will save an estimated 12.5 million kilowatt-hours of electricity and 1.1 million therms of natural gas annually, which is enough to eliminate more than 35 million pounds of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere.
CREWE is a coalition that formed to advocate meaningful change in energy policy consistent with the Governor’s Global Warming Task Force final report, which will have a positive impact on Wisconsin’s economic development and security while fostering job creation.
CREWE’s membership consists of CleanPower, Alliant Energy, EcoEnergy, Johnson Controls, Xcel Energy, C5•6 Technologies, Axley Brynelson, Madison Gas and Electric, Orion Energy Systems, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin Energy Corp., Poblocki Sign Company, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, MillerCoors, American Transmission Co., WPPI Energy, DTE Energy Services, Kranz, Inc. and Greenwood Fuels.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Watch as turbine is installed in one minute!
From an article by Peter J. Devlin in the Door County Advocate:
The owner of a town of Egg Harbor business hopes to generate the majority of its electricity needs from the wind.
Saundra Phlubna owns and operates the Feathered Star Bed and Breakfast on Wisconsin 42, north of Carlsville, where a 110-foot-tall tower and wind turbine were erected last week.
"I'm hoping to get as close as possible to meeting all my electrical needs with the wind generator," she said.
The turbine is not yet connected to her business. It needs to have adjustments made while the turbine is turning in moderate wind, Phlubna said. There hasn't been enough wind this week for the contractor to complete the project. Last week was too windy for the final adjusting, she said.
The turbine has been in the works for two years. A permit for the device was issued in December 2008 by Egg Harbor Town Chairman Paul Peterson. Other permits, including a Door County Wind Energy sighting permit, were approved before construction of the tower began last month.
A portion of the cost of the new structure and the generator came from grants, Phlubna said. The first two grants she sought were turned down. In reapplying, Wisconsin's Focus On Energy program and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rural Development grant program provided some of the funds needed.
Seventh Generation Energy Services, Madison, installed the 35 kilowatt V-15 turbine.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Clean Energy Jobs Act will prepare state companies for carbon rules
From a news release issued by the business coalition Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy:
(MADISON, Wis.)—The proposed Clean Energy Jobs Act will prepare Wisconsin businesses for upcoming federal climate legislation, especially as it relates to managing carbon output, the coalition for Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy (CREWE) announced today.
As exemplified by a report in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, businesses must brace “for a variety of new mandates aimed at disclosing to investors the carbon risks they face.” Rules are already in place from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Securities and Exchange Commission, among other agencies.
“Regardless of when federal climate legislation will be passed, the provisions in the Clean Energy Jobs Act will steer local companies in the right direction in addressing their carbon output,” Thad Nation, executive director of CREWE, said. “We need to do everything we can to help our state’s businesses because their viability directly affects Wisconsin’s economic climate.”
The Clean Energy Jobs Act (AB 649/SB 450) includes energy efficiency programs and renewable portfolio standards that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from state businesses.
CREWE is a coalition that formed to advocate meaningful change in energy policy consistent with the Governor’s Global Warming Task Force final report, which will have a positive impact on Wisconsin’s economic development and security while fostering job creation.
CREWE’s membership consists of CleanPower, Alliant Energy, EcoEnergy, Johnson Controls, Xcel Energy, C5•6 Technologies, Axley Brynelson, Madison Gas and Electric, Orion Energy Systems, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin Energy Corp., Poblocki Sign Company, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, MillerCoors, America Transmission Co., WPPI Energy, DTE Energy Services, Kranz, Inc. and Greenwood Fuels.
(MADISON, Wis.)—The proposed Clean Energy Jobs Act will prepare Wisconsin businesses for upcoming federal climate legislation, especially as it relates to managing carbon output, the coalition for Clean, Responsible Energy for Wisconsin’s Economy (CREWE) announced today.
As exemplified by a report in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, businesses must brace “for a variety of new mandates aimed at disclosing to investors the carbon risks they face.” Rules are already in place from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Securities and Exchange Commission, among other agencies.
“Regardless of when federal climate legislation will be passed, the provisions in the Clean Energy Jobs Act will steer local companies in the right direction in addressing their carbon output,” Thad Nation, executive director of CREWE, said. “We need to do everything we can to help our state’s businesses because their viability directly affects Wisconsin’s economic climate.”
The Clean Energy Jobs Act (AB 649/SB 450) includes energy efficiency programs and renewable portfolio standards that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from state businesses.
CREWE is a coalition that formed to advocate meaningful change in energy policy consistent with the Governor’s Global Warming Task Force final report, which will have a positive impact on Wisconsin’s economic development and security while fostering job creation.
CREWE’s membership consists of CleanPower, Alliant Energy, EcoEnergy, Johnson Controls, Xcel Energy, C5•6 Technologies, Axley Brynelson, Madison Gas and Electric, Orion Energy Systems, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Wisconsin Energy Corp., Poblocki Sign Company, Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, MillerCoors, America Transmission Co., WPPI Energy, DTE Energy Services, Kranz, Inc. and Greenwood Fuels.
Monday, March 8, 2010
Coal is king in Wisconsin
From an article by Mike Ivey in The Capital Times:
You might not know from all the breathless stories about biomass, wind power or solar energy, but Wisconsin is burning coal like there is no tomorrow.
A new report from Clean Wisconsin notes that while coal use dropped 9.3 percent in the U.S. last year, it was rising in the land of Packer football and factory farming.
Wisconsin increased its consumption of coal for electric production by 1.1 percent between November 2008 and November 2009, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's February 2010 "Electric Power Monthly."
The increase is directly attributable to Wisconsin's recent construction of three new coal plants which cost nearly $3 billion in construction costs alone, the group said.
"The $16 billion river of dirty fossil fuels flowing into our state is getting deeper," said Peter Taglia, staff scientist at Clean Wisconsin, the state's largest environmental advocacy organization. "Coal is the dirtiest source of power production, and, with no fossil fuel reserves of our own, we create significant environmental and economic harm to our state by relying on coal to meet our energy needs."
Taglia said the increase "highlights the need to maintain strong renewable energy standards and energy efficiency provisions in the Clean Energy Jobs Act."
You might not know from all the breathless stories about biomass, wind power or solar energy, but Wisconsin is burning coal like there is no tomorrow.
A new report from Clean Wisconsin notes that while coal use dropped 9.3 percent in the U.S. last year, it was rising in the land of Packer football and factory farming.
Wisconsin increased its consumption of coal for electric production by 1.1 percent between November 2008 and November 2009, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's February 2010 "Electric Power Monthly."
The increase is directly attributable to Wisconsin's recent construction of three new coal plants which cost nearly $3 billion in construction costs alone, the group said.
"The $16 billion river of dirty fossil fuels flowing into our state is getting deeper," said Peter Taglia, staff scientist at Clean Wisconsin, the state's largest environmental advocacy organization. "Coal is the dirtiest source of power production, and, with no fossil fuel reserves of our own, we create significant environmental and economic harm to our state by relying on coal to meet our energy needs."
Taglia said the increase "highlights the need to maintain strong renewable energy standards and energy efficiency provisions in the Clean Energy Jobs Act."
Friday, March 5, 2010
State clean energy programs create thousands of jobs
From a news release issued by Governor Doyle:
Newly Released Independent Report Confirms Job Creation Potential of Clean Energy Policies
MADISON – Governor Jim Doyle announced today the release of an independent evaluation that shows Wisconsin’s clean energy programs through Focus on Energy have added more than 5,000 jobs and more than $1 billion to Wisconsin’s economy since the program began in 2001.
“This independent report is yet further confirmation that our existing energy efficiency and renewable energy programs are proven job creators,” Governor Doyle said. “Because of good government policy and our renewable energy standards, we now have hundreds of companies in Wisconsin creating thousands of jobs in the emerging clean energy sector. By increasing our efforts in these areas, we can make businesses more competitive, add to individuals’ disposable income, and create jobs here in Wisconsin.”
The independent evaluation of economic development benefits was completed by PA Consulting Group, Inc. and Economic Development Research Group, Inc. – both leading, independent consulting firms serving public and private sector clients throughout the world. State law requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to contract for periodic independent evaluations of the Focus on Energy programs. This is the second such report evaluating economic development benefits.
The evaluation of economic development benefits used actual program data and sophisticated economic models to estimate the past, present and future value of Focus on Energy programs. Over the first 10 years, Focus on Energy programs added $1.428 billion cumulatively to Wisconsin’s gross state product. Today, 5,194 full time employees work in jobs supported by the programs that would not otherwise exist, including 1,220 jobs in the construction trades and 366 manufacturing jobs. Manufacturing output is $137 million greater than it otherwise would be, and virtually every sector of the economy has higher employment than it would in the absence of the Focus on Energy programs.
The evaluation report also considered the likely economic impacts that will result if Focus on Energy funding is increased to levels proposed in the Clean Energy Jobs Act that is currently being debated in the Wisconsin Legislature. According to the report, investment at that increased level of funding could increase gross state product by more than $2 billion per year and support more than 20,000 jobs.
“These are eye-opening results,” said PSC Chairperson Eric Callisto. “They point to an economic opportunity that Wisconsin cannot afford to miss. It’s easy to see why the Governor’s Task Force unanimously recommended enhancing Wisconsin’s energy efficiency programs. . . .”
The newly-released report, Focus on Energy Evaluation – Economic Development Benefits: CY09 Economic Impacts, can be found by visiting: http://www.focusonenergy.com/files/Document_Management_System/Evaluation/cy09economicimpactsreport_evaluationreport.pdf
The analysis of the Clean Energy Jobs Act can be found by visiting: http://www.climatestrategies.us/ewebeditpro/items/O25F22680.pdf
Newly Released Independent Report Confirms Job Creation Potential of Clean Energy Policies
MADISON – Governor Jim Doyle announced today the release of an independent evaluation that shows Wisconsin’s clean energy programs through Focus on Energy have added more than 5,000 jobs and more than $1 billion to Wisconsin’s economy since the program began in 2001.
“This independent report is yet further confirmation that our existing energy efficiency and renewable energy programs are proven job creators,” Governor Doyle said. “Because of good government policy and our renewable energy standards, we now have hundreds of companies in Wisconsin creating thousands of jobs in the emerging clean energy sector. By increasing our efforts in these areas, we can make businesses more competitive, add to individuals’ disposable income, and create jobs here in Wisconsin.”
The independent evaluation of economic development benefits was completed by PA Consulting Group, Inc. and Economic Development Research Group, Inc. – both leading, independent consulting firms serving public and private sector clients throughout the world. State law requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to contract for periodic independent evaluations of the Focus on Energy programs. This is the second such report evaluating economic development benefits.
The evaluation of economic development benefits used actual program data and sophisticated economic models to estimate the past, present and future value of Focus on Energy programs. Over the first 10 years, Focus on Energy programs added $1.428 billion cumulatively to Wisconsin’s gross state product. Today, 5,194 full time employees work in jobs supported by the programs that would not otherwise exist, including 1,220 jobs in the construction trades and 366 manufacturing jobs. Manufacturing output is $137 million greater than it otherwise would be, and virtually every sector of the economy has higher employment than it would in the absence of the Focus on Energy programs.
The evaluation report also considered the likely economic impacts that will result if Focus on Energy funding is increased to levels proposed in the Clean Energy Jobs Act that is currently being debated in the Wisconsin Legislature. According to the report, investment at that increased level of funding could increase gross state product by more than $2 billion per year and support more than 20,000 jobs.
“These are eye-opening results,” said PSC Chairperson Eric Callisto. “They point to an economic opportunity that Wisconsin cannot afford to miss. It’s easy to see why the Governor’s Task Force unanimously recommended enhancing Wisconsin’s energy efficiency programs. . . .”
The newly-released report, Focus on Energy Evaluation – Economic Development Benefits: CY09 Economic Impacts, can be found by visiting: http://www.focusonenergy.com/files/Document_Management_System/Evaluation/cy09economicimpactsreport_evaluationreport.pdf
The analysis of the Clean Energy Jobs Act can be found by visiting: http://www.climatestrategies.us/ewebeditpro/items/O25F22680.pdf
Thursday, March 4, 2010
PSC Chair: Clean Energy Jobs Act always cheaper than status quo
From a letter by PSC Chair Eric Callisto to the special committees on clean energy jobs:
. . . [W]hat follows is a summary of preliminary PSC cost modeling of the RPS and energy efficiency components of the CEJA. . . .
The modeling shows that in every case in which GHGs are monetized (i.e., there is a compliance cost associated with emitting GHGs), the cost of the CEJA is less than the cost of the status quo over the long run. That is, we will in all likelihood be spending more on electricity in the long run if we don't act now and enact enhanced renewable portfolio standards and take more aggressive action on energy efficiency. . . . (Note: emphasis in original letter)
Table 4 (Note: Tables 1 – 3 were deleted for this summary) shows the forecasted impact of the proposed legislation on monthly electricity bills for an average residential customer. As in previous tables, these values show the incremental impact of the CEJA compared to the Status Quo. For example, the table indicates that monthly bills will be $1.08 lower under CEJA than under the Status Quo if GHG emissions cost $10/ton. Monthly bill impacts were not calculated for commercial and industrial customers because bills in those customer classes vary more widely than residential bills. . . .
. . . [W]hat follows is a summary of preliminary PSC cost modeling of the RPS and energy efficiency components of the CEJA. . . .
The modeling shows that in every case in which GHGs are monetized (i.e., there is a compliance cost associated with emitting GHGs), the cost of the CEJA is less than the cost of the status quo over the long run. That is, we will in all likelihood be spending more on electricity in the long run if we don't act now and enact enhanced renewable portfolio standards and take more aggressive action on energy efficiency. . . . (Note: emphasis in original letter)
Table 4 (Note: Tables 1 – 3 were deleted for this summary) shows the forecasted impact of the proposed legislation on monthly electricity bills for an average residential customer. As in previous tables, these values show the incremental impact of the CEJA compared to the Status Quo. For example, the table indicates that monthly bills will be $1.08 lower under CEJA than under the Status Quo if GHG emissions cost $10/ton. Monthly bill impacts were not calculated for commercial and industrial customers because bills in those customer classes vary more widely than residential bills. . . .
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
PSC issues draft report on the potential for carbon sequestration, seeks comment
A news release issued by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin:
MADISON – Today, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) in partnership with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources issued a draft report on the potential of geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide produced by Wisconsin’s coal-fired power plants. The PSC is asking for public input on the draft report.
Based on recommendations by the Governor's Task Force on Global Warming, the PSC and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources formed a Study Group to look into the potential for carbon sequestration in Wisconsin, a process of capturing carbon dioxide produced by coal-fired power plants that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere and securely storing, or sequestering, the carbon dioxide underground. Carbon dioxide is one of several known greenhouse gases (GHG) that contribute to global warming.
“New regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions appear to be inevitable,” said PSC Commissioner Mark Meyer. “These regulations could radically change the economics of coal-fired electric generation unless the associated carbon dioxide emissions are reduced. I want to thank the work group for their hard work in preparing this report. It is in step with keeping Governor Doyle’s vision of Wisconsin being a leader in producing cleaner more efficient energy.”
Wisconsin currently relies on coal for roughly 38% of the state’s installed electric generating capacity and 66% of actual generation. Coal has historically been an abundant and inexpensive fuel for electric generation, but it also emits more carbon dioxide per unit of electricity than any other fuel in common use, making it the largest source of GHG in Wisconsin and nationally, responsible for more than 30% of total emissions.
The Study Group found that several promising technologies are being developed and tested for capturing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Carbon dioxide can be captured either pre- or post-combustion, depending on the type of power plant, and compressed for transport and disposal. The Study Group also found that long-distance transport of carbon dioxide is a proven, viable option with over 3,000 miles of pipeline already in use for this purpose nationwide.
The Study Group conducted its business publicly. All meetings were open to the public, and associated documents were available to the public via the Public Service Commission website.
The PSC is looking for the public to comment on the draft report by April 2, 2010. The draft report, An Investigation to Explore the Potential for Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Produced by Wisconsin’s Electricity Generation Fleet, can be found by visiting the PSC website and clicking on the Regulatory Filing System (ERF) at http://psc.wi.gov/. Type case numbers 5-EI-145 in the boxes provided on the ERF system.
MADISON – Today, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSC) in partnership with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources issued a draft report on the potential of geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide produced by Wisconsin’s coal-fired power plants. The PSC is asking for public input on the draft report.
Based on recommendations by the Governor's Task Force on Global Warming, the PSC and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources formed a Study Group to look into the potential for carbon sequestration in Wisconsin, a process of capturing carbon dioxide produced by coal-fired power plants that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere and securely storing, or sequestering, the carbon dioxide underground. Carbon dioxide is one of several known greenhouse gases (GHG) that contribute to global warming.
“New regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions appear to be inevitable,” said PSC Commissioner Mark Meyer. “These regulations could radically change the economics of coal-fired electric generation unless the associated carbon dioxide emissions are reduced. I want to thank the work group for their hard work in preparing this report. It is in step with keeping Governor Doyle’s vision of Wisconsin being a leader in producing cleaner more efficient energy.”
Wisconsin currently relies on coal for roughly 38% of the state’s installed electric generating capacity and 66% of actual generation. Coal has historically been an abundant and inexpensive fuel for electric generation, but it also emits more carbon dioxide per unit of electricity than any other fuel in common use, making it the largest source of GHG in Wisconsin and nationally, responsible for more than 30% of total emissions.
The Study Group found that several promising technologies are being developed and tested for capturing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Carbon dioxide can be captured either pre- or post-combustion, depending on the type of power plant, and compressed for transport and disposal. The Study Group also found that long-distance transport of carbon dioxide is a proven, viable option with over 3,000 miles of pipeline already in use for this purpose nationwide.
The Study Group conducted its business publicly. All meetings were open to the public, and associated documents were available to the public via the Public Service Commission website.
The PSC is looking for the public to comment on the draft report by April 2, 2010. The draft report, An Investigation to Explore the Potential for Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Produced by Wisconsin’s Electricity Generation Fleet, can be found by visiting the PSC website and clicking on the Regulatory Filing System (ERF) at http://psc.wi.gov/. Type case numbers 5-EI-145 in the boxes provided on the ERF system.
Monday, March 1, 2010
This act is not just about jobs; it's about the future
From an editorial in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
It's about whether the quality of our future is seriously diminished by climate change. Wisconsin must do its part. Tweak it, but approve the Clean Energy Jobs Act.
The tone and tenor of the debate over the Clean Energy Jobs Act was determined the moment the legislation was named.
Supporters built into the name what they, not unreasonably, believed would be one of the bill's principal virtues: job creation. But, with recession-induced trauma still fresh in everyone's minds, it is simply too easy and expedient - facts be damned - to call virtually any new legislation a jobs killer, from health care reform to even a jobs bill.
We believe the jobs will be there, but it is important at this juncture to recognize that this bill is not really intended as an economic stimulus measure. In very real terms, it is an attempt at economic and environmental reinvention - done with the specter of climate change and all its effects looming.
Yes, climate change, with humanity as a major contributor, is real. But even if you don't believe that, there is little to no downside to a future in which a good portion of our energy comes from renewable sources - 25% by 2025 - and no downside to a future in which energy efficiencies mean we are doing the same or more with less energy.
The reinvention comes in two other goals: growing new technologies and fostering energy independence. Doing this will have far more enduring effects on those bottom lines in the future than any short-term benefit derived from doing nothing now to cushion today's corporate bottom lines.
On jobs, there are two dueling studies cited most often on whether the Clean Energy Jobs Act will actually create jobs.
One is by researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Southern California for the Center on Climate Strategies, the results of which are similar to findings by various state agencies. It forecasts a net increase of more than 16,200 new jobs in Wisconsin by 2025. It predicts a boost to the state's economy of $4.85 billion total "in net present value" from 2011 to 2025.
The other study was done by the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. It contends that policies similar to those in the bill would kill 43,000 Wisconsin jobs. The problem: It did not model the actual policies in the bill.
The Michigan study is more believable.
It's about whether the quality of our future is seriously diminished by climate change. Wisconsin must do its part. Tweak it, but approve the Clean Energy Jobs Act.
The tone and tenor of the debate over the Clean Energy Jobs Act was determined the moment the legislation was named.
Supporters built into the name what they, not unreasonably, believed would be one of the bill's principal virtues: job creation. But, with recession-induced trauma still fresh in everyone's minds, it is simply too easy and expedient - facts be damned - to call virtually any new legislation a jobs killer, from health care reform to even a jobs bill.
We believe the jobs will be there, but it is important at this juncture to recognize that this bill is not really intended as an economic stimulus measure. In very real terms, it is an attempt at economic and environmental reinvention - done with the specter of climate change and all its effects looming.
Yes, climate change, with humanity as a major contributor, is real. But even if you don't believe that, there is little to no downside to a future in which a good portion of our energy comes from renewable sources - 25% by 2025 - and no downside to a future in which energy efficiencies mean we are doing the same or more with less energy.
The reinvention comes in two other goals: growing new technologies and fostering energy independence. Doing this will have far more enduring effects on those bottom lines in the future than any short-term benefit derived from doing nothing now to cushion today's corporate bottom lines.
On jobs, there are two dueling studies cited most often on whether the Clean Energy Jobs Act will actually create jobs.
One is by researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Southern California for the Center on Climate Strategies, the results of which are similar to findings by various state agencies. It forecasts a net increase of more than 16,200 new jobs in Wisconsin by 2025. It predicts a boost to the state's economy of $4.85 billion total "in net present value" from 2011 to 2025.
The other study was done by the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. It contends that policies similar to those in the bill would kill 43,000 Wisconsin jobs. The problem: It did not model the actual policies in the bill.
The Michigan study is more believable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)